Jubilee, Jubilah

So it’s been 60 years since the Queen’s Dad died. What better way for her to remember him than a 4 day stramash of different events that may or may not be fun for an octogenarian.

But what I am finding even stranger (if that’s possible), and in fact slightly offensive, is all the chat about ‘life 60 years ago’ and ‘how Britain has changed’. This mostly seems to centre on some kind of idyllic review of the 1950s, or a eulogy to modernity, or to take the opportunity to criticise modern life, and to lament the lack of real progress.

The contrary nature of these commentaries rather suggests that a) it all depends on your perspective and b) some of the comments aren’t terribly well thought through.

Comparing Britain now to Britain in 1952 just because that’s when George VI died is disingenuous at best and harmful at worst. The country was still in recovery from WWII for a start. I’m not a historian so I’m not going to go into detail but we all know that the 50s images of the ‘little woman’ having dinner on the table for her husband as soon as he gets home from work. Obviously things have changed.

But some things haven’t. Inequality is still rife in the UK. And a hereditary head of state probably isn’t helping with ‘social mobility’. (I put  this in quotation marks as I find it an odd statement, surely it’s about equality, not mobility?)

Perhaps rather than wittering about divorce and anti-depressants (thanks Bishop of London for your terribly insightful comments – not), commentators should be questioning why, in 60 years, we have failed to close the equality gap.

And don’t tell me that Britain is ‘wealthier than it’s ever been’, when child poverty keeps rising, when we value commodities over human rights and environmental goods, and frankly, when we measure ‘wealth’ using only the amount of money we have.

Perhaps, as mentioned, we should query whether the way we structure our society, with a monarch, a Parliament full of white privileged men, and a Cabinet with more millionaires than women (yes I will keep using that stat, it is appalling), is part of the problem. Perhaps we should question why we let private banks keep creating money out of thin air and then wonder why it can’t be paid back (clue: it didn’t exist in the first place). Perhaps we should think about valuing something other than privilege and cash. Perhaps this ‘Jubilee’ is an opportunity to completely re-think Britain. To turn it around. This could be as radical as allowing homeless families to live in Buckingham Palace, or Holyrood, or Balmoral, or Sandringham. Or it could be as simple as a debt jubilee. Or it could be as straight forward as actually working to make our country more equal, rather than spending 4 days celebrating our inequality.

Advertisements

One thought on “Jubilee, Jubilah

  1. The “little woman” image is even more annoying in that it’s also wrong. It was only the case for the (then significantly smaller) middle class. Working class women have always worked and the upper classes, well, you know. Even then, the stay at home mum in a nuclear family was an aberration. Historically the period from the mid-40s to the 80s is the odd one out, not our current time. Single worker families with significant levels of remarriage are not actually standard. (Although admittedly the reason for remarriage was previously death, not divorce.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s